New Delhi: On the morning of May 7, 2025, Operation Sindoor marked a transformative shift in India’s approach to cross-border terrorism. More than just a military operation, it served as a strong and unambiguous message to the world: India will no longer remain silent in the face of terror emanating from across its borders. Launched exactly two weeks after the deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22 that killed 26 civilians — including a Nepali national — the operation was India’s resolute response to mounting public anger and grief.
In a meticulously executed counteroffensive, the Indian Armed Forces targeted and demolished nine major terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir belonging to Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. The targeted sites included Sawai Nala and Syedna Bilal camps in Muzaffarabad; Gulpur and Abbas camps in Kotli; Barnala camp in Bhimber; Sarjal and Mehmuna Zoya camps in Sialkot; Markaz Tayyaba in Muridke; and Markaz Subhanallah in Bahawalpur.
Prominent global analysts such as Tom Cooper, John Spencer, and Jennifer Zeng have since offered detailed evaluations of the operation, highlighting its strategic brilliance, military precision, and broader geopolitical implications.
Strategic Precision and Air Dominance: Tom Cooper’s Analysis
Austrian military historian Tom Cooper credited India’s air superiority as the primary factor behind its successful campaign. He noted Pakistan’s failure to mount a credible response as a testament to India’s strategic effectiveness.
“In this case, India achieved a clear victory, and it’s no surprise that Pakistan was the first to call for a ceasefire,” Cooper remarked.
He pointed out that Pakistan’s usual retaliatory playbook — including nuclear threats — was ineffective. India’s aggressive and calibrated response rendered such posturing moot. According to Cooper, Pakistan’s retreat was likely driven by its dwindling ammunition reserves and the heavy losses inflicted upon its UAV fleet.
A New Doctrine and Strategic Autonomy: Views from John Spencer
John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute, praised India’s strategic restraint coupled with overwhelming response, calling Operation Sindoor a redefinition of red lines in South Asia.
“India struck back hard, but deliberately stopped short of full-scale war — a remarkable display of deterrence through measured force,” Spencer observed. He described the operation as not just a tactical win but a strategic milestone that demonstrated:
-
A new red line: Any terror attack from Pakistani soil will now be treated as an act of war.
-
Operational dominance: India demonstrated its capability to strike at will, targeting terror camps, drone command hubs, and airbases deep inside Pakistan, while Pakistan failed to breach Indian territory.
-
Restored deterrence: By hitting hard and then halting escalation, India signaled both control and strength.
-
Strategic independence: India managed the situation without relying on external mediation, asserting its sovereignty in conflict response.
Detailed Timeline of India’s Strategic Strikes: Jennifer Zeng’s Report
Jennifer Zeng, a member of the International Press Association, provided an on-ground assessment of how India’s calibrated strikes led to Pakistan’s diplomatic scramble for a ceasefire.
May 7
India launched a large-scale air offensive using Rafale jets and BrahMos missiles, targeting camps linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba, crippling Pakistan’s proxy networks.
May 8
Precision strikes destroyed Pakistan’s HQ-16 air defense systems in Lahore, exposing its dependency on foreign military technology.
May 9
Airbases like Noor Khan and Rafiqui were bombed, degrading Pakistan’s airstrike capabilities.
Pakistan’s retaliatory drones, missiles, and jets were intercepted by India’s S-400 Triumph systems.
Six missiles launched by Pakistan were neutralized mid-air, marking a pivotal moment in the conflict.
Facing mounting losses, Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir reached out to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, and Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, appealing for diplomatic intervention to avoid complete military defeat.
May 10
Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) requested a ceasefire. A mutually agreed truce was brokered by international mediators and implemented at 5:00 PM that day.
Conclusion: A Turning Point in India’s Strategic Posture
Operation Sindoor will go down as a decisive milestone in India’s modern military doctrine — not only for its operational success but for the strategic message it delivered. It proved that India is now fully prepared to destroy terror infrastructure with controlled, legitimate, and precise force — without plunging the region into uncontrollable conflict.
India’s strikes neutralized key threats, restored a long-eroded sense of deterrence, and protected civilian lives — all while stopping short of full-scale war. As Cooper, Spencer, and Zeng noted, India showcased a doctrine that is assertive but measured, precise yet devastating.
Pakistan’s failure to defend or retaliate effectively, and its early plea for ceasefire, marked a significant shift in regional dynamics. Through Operation Sindoor, India not only achieved a military triumph — it rewrote the rules of engagement. The world now knows: strategic restraint does not equate to strategic weakness. When provoked, India will respond with strength, purpose, and precision — and on its own terms.
